Germany’s flawed assumptions behind €4.4bn lignite compensation: exclusive analysis

Three key assumptions in the German government’s calculation lead to a systematic overvaluation of the compensation payments

In December 2020, the German government approved a contract to compensate owners of lignite power plants for the closure of their assets. Under this agreement, RWE and LEAG will receive €2.6 billion and €1.75 billion to shut down some of their plants and mines before 2030.   

Ember has obtained the formula used for Germany’s lignite compensation payments from Greenpeace, through an information request it made to Germany’s Ministry of Economics (BMWi). For the first time, it has been possible to examine how the German government calculated the proposed compensation. 

Our assessment of the formula is that it contains three key assumptions that lead to a systematic overvaluation of the compensation payments. 

Any three of our proposed adjustments, when considered individually, would approximately halve the compensation amount. If combined together, they would reduce the compensation from €4.4 billion to just €343 million.

Problematic BMWi assumptions:

  • Applying arbitrary power and CO2 prices. The BMWi calculation takes average forward power and CO2 prices from Jan-17 to Dec-19. We feel using forward prices from Jan-20 to Dec-20 is fairer, as this more closely corresponds to expected utility hedging strategies for 2021-2023. Compensation would be almost halved to €2.6 billion instead of €4.4 billion.
  • Assuming no fixed costs can be saved through early closure. A proportion of future fixed costs are avoided when a plant and mine are closed. We feel Oeko Institut’s assumption of partial fixed costs savings is fair. This would halve compensation to €2.1 billion instead of €4.4 billion.
  • Assuming 4 to 5 years of compensation. Oeko Institut proposes that the period of compensation for accelerating shutdowns should be three years. We feel this is a fair assumption – and may even be generous as company plans suggest assets were forecast to close earlier. Three years would reduce compensation to €2.8 billion instead of €4.4 billion.

We are not alone in our concerns regarding the compensation calculations. In March, the European Commission launched an investigation to assess the validity of the compensation under EU State aid rules. The Commission published their findings in a letter on 21 April, expressing genuine doubts about the assumptions the German government has made in determining the payment amounts.

The issue of compensation for the closure of lignite plants has become increasingly contentious with the German government’s new proposed emissions reduction target of 65% by 2030 and carbon prices exceeding €55/tonne.

Read Ember’s full analysis of the compensation formula, including a detailed breakdown of each problematic assumption.

Analysis by Ember (Dave Jones and Sarah Brown). Commissioned by Greenpeace Germany. 

More posts you might like

Unpicking the knot of coal phase out in China

Unpicking the knot of coal phase out in China

The challenge of coal phase out in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Region shows the complexity of energy transition in China.
IEA’s global roadmap for net-zero energy emissions: Insights for China

IEA’s global roadmap for net-zero energy emissions: Insights for China

The IEA's net zero by 2050 roadmap makes clear that ambitious action in the short term is needed globally, including within China.
Message to the P4G Summit: 100% clean power is the key to carbon neutrality

Message to the P4G Summit: 100% clean power is the key to carbon neutrality

P4G members can take confidence from the IEA Net Zero report that 100% clean power is crucial for carbon neutrality.
Coal power air pollution

Coal power air pollution

Ukraine, Turkey and Western Balkan countries rank highly across pollutant types for coal power air pollution in Europe.