Germany’s flawed assumptions behind €4.4bn lignite compensation: exclusive analysis

Three key assumptions in the German government’s calculation lead to a systematic overvaluation of the compensation payments

In December 2020, the German government approved a contract to compensate owners of lignite power plants for the closure of their assets. Under this agreement, RWE and LEAG will receive €2.6 billion and €1.75 billion to shut down some of their plants and mines before 2030.   

Ember has obtained the formula used for Germany’s lignite compensation payments from Greenpeace, through an information request it made to Germany’s Ministry of Economics (BMWi). For the first time, it has been possible to examine how the German government calculated the proposed compensation. 

Our assessment of the formula is that it contains three key assumptions that lead to a systematic overvaluation of the compensation payments. 

Any three of our proposed adjustments, when considered individually, would approximately halve the compensation amount. If combined together, they would reduce the compensation from €4.4 billion to just €343 million.

Problematic BMWi assumptions:

  • Applying arbitrary power and CO2 prices. The BMWi calculation takes average forward power and CO2 prices from Jan-17 to Dec-19. We feel using forward prices from Jan-20 to Dec-20 is fairer, as this more closely corresponds to expected utility hedging strategies for 2021-2023. Compensation would be almost halved to €2.6 billion instead of €4.4 billion.
  • Assuming no fixed costs can be saved through early closure. A proportion of future fixed costs are avoided when a plant and mine are closed. We feel Oeko Institut’s assumption of partial fixed costs savings is fair. This would halve compensation to €2.1 billion instead of €4.4 billion.
  • Assuming 4 to 5 years of compensation. Oeko Institut proposes that the period of compensation for accelerating shutdowns should be three years. We feel this is a fair assumption – and may even be generous as company plans suggest assets were forecast to close earlier. Three years would reduce compensation to €2.8 billion instead of €4.4 billion.

We are not alone in our concerns regarding the compensation calculations. In March, the European Commission launched an investigation to assess the validity of the compensation under EU State aid rules. The Commission published their findings in a letter on 21 April, expressing genuine doubts about the assumptions the German government has made in determining the payment amounts.

The issue of compensation for the closure of lignite plants has become increasingly contentious with the German government’s new proposed emissions reduction target of 65% by 2030 and carbon prices exceeding €55/tonne.

Read Ember’s full analysis of the compensation formula, including a detailed breakdown of each problematic assumption.

Analysis by Ember (Dave Jones and Sarah Brown). Commissioned by Greenpeace Germany. 

More posts you might like

EU solar power hits new record peak this summer

EU solar power hits new record peak this summer

New analysis by energy think tank Ember reveals that, for the first time, solar panels generated a tenth of EU-27 electricity during their peak months of June and July this year.
Clean power by 2035 to meet climate targets says National Grid

Clean power by 2035 to meet climate targets says National Grid

Less than 1% unabated fossil fuels and at least 80% wind and solar in the power mix required to meet UK climate targets in National Grid’s new analysis.
Why efficiency improvement is a key enabler for coal phase-out in China

Why efficiency improvement is a key enabler for coal phase-out in China

Tapping into the huge potential for electricity efficiency improvements could help China enable coal phase out as the economy grows.
Top 15 Wind and Solar Power Countries in 2020

Top 15 Wind and Solar Power Countries in 2020

Data from Ember's Global Electricity Review reveals the top 15 countries for wind and solar globally in 2020.