
Breadcrumbs
European Electricity Review 2023
Ember’s analysis of the EU electricity transition in 2022: what happened in 2022, what can we expect for 2023?
Highlights
4
Months of falling coal power generation since September
+3%
Rise in EU fossil generation in 2022
-20%
Predicted fall in EU fossil generation in 2023
About
The European Electricity Review analyses full-year electricity generation and demand data for 2022 in all EU-27 countries to understand the region’s progress in transitioning from fossil fuels to clean electricity. It is the seventh annual report on the EU power sector published by Ember (previously as Sandbag). Our data is free and easily downloadable, and is available at annual and monthly granularity. We hope others also find the data useful for their own analysis.
Executive summary
Europe's electricity transition emerges from the energy crisis stronger than ever
Coal generation has been falling since the start of winter, and as the electricity transition heats up, falling fossil fuel power—especially gas— is set to be the story of 2023.
Head of Data Insights, Ember
Europe has avoided the worst of the energy crisis. The shocks of 2022 only caused a minor ripple in coal power and a huge wave of support for renewables. Any fears of a coal rebound are now dead. Europe's clean power transition emerges from this crisis stronger than ever. Not only are European countries still committed to phasing out coal, they are now striving to phase out gas as well. The energy crisis has undoubtedly sped up Europe’s electricity transition. Europe is hurtling towards a clean, electrified economy, and this will be on full display in 2023. Change is coming fast, and everyone needs to be ready for it.

Chapter 1 | Pathway for 1.5C
Shifting to clean electricity by 2035
Transforming Europe’s electricity sector will be a critical part of building a new energy system that addresses the triple crisis of climate, energy security and affordability.
Chapter 2 | The Big Picture
Insights
The biggest stories of 2022: the return to coal that wasn’t, winter demand collapse and solar’s surge. And looking forward, 2023 should be the year that the full scale of the transition becomes clear.
The first two weeks of 2023, at the time of writing, had already seen a 29% fall in fossil generation compared to the same period in 2022, although the weather has been mild and windy across Europe.
Chapter 3 | EU Electricity Trends
Data on the EU’s electricity sector in 2022
Data on the EU electricity sector in 2022, with an overview of changes and trends over the last two decades.
Chapter 4 | Electricity Source Trends
Data on EU electricity sources in 2022
Data on EU electricity generation from bioenergy, coal, gas, hydro, nuclear, solar and wind in 2022, with an overview of changes and trends over the last two decades.
Conclusion
An accelerator year for the EU’s transition to clean power
There is no doubt that 2022 was an extremely challenging year for the EU. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine created massive shockwaves and caused an unprecedented energy crisis, which in turn fuelled a crippling hike in living costs. One outcome has been a rush to cut dependence on Russian fossil fuel imports.
This can only be achieved through an accelerated clean energy transition. It became abundantly clear that fossil fuels are not the solution. Instead, they cause skyrocketing electricity prices and energy insecurity. Coal power did increase year-on-year, but this was due to hydro and nuclear issues rather than any appetite to revitalise the role of coal. Some coal-fired units may have been placed on standby for the winter but this is a short-term, emergency measure, resulting in minimal generation. The anticipated coal resurgence failed to materialise and current high stock levels will limit coal import requirements for 2023. Europe’s coal phase-out is well and truly still alive.
Electricity demand dropped significantly in the fourth quarter of 2022 due to both mandated and voluntary energy savings and mild weather. However, we do not know how long this will last and, ultimately, the transition will increase electricity demand. This higher consumption must be met through renewable energy sources.
So it is extremely encouraging that 2022 saw record generation and capacity additions for wind and solar. Both played a critical role in mitigating the impact of the energy crisis— from a financial, security and climate perspective—with solar leading the charge. And the outlook is even brighter with acknowledgement that even more ambitious targets are achievable over the coming years.
The transition will gain even more momentum in 2023 and beyond. It is not only necessary but inevitable. The EU must now step up to ensure the right policies, investments and infrastructure are in place to enable this.
Supporting Material
Methodology
The data in this report is curated by Ember. The full dataset is available to download. Please address any data queries to data@ember-climate.org.
Generation, imports and demand
Annual data from 2000 to 2020 is gross generation, published by Eurostat. More recent data is an estimate of gross generation, based on net generation gathered from monthly data. This estimate is calculated by applying absolute changes in net generation to the most recent gross baseline.
Net imports from 2000 to 2020 are also published by Eurostat, with recent data estimated in the same manner as generation. Demand is calculated as the sum of generation and net imports, and validated against direct demand figures published by ENTSO-E.
Monthly data is gathered from a number of sources, including both centrally reported ENTSO-E data and directly reported national transmission system operators. In some cases data is published on a monthly lag; here we have estimated recent months based on relative changes in previous years. These cases are flagged in the dataset.
Monthly published data is often reported provisionally, and is far from perfect. Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, and where possible we compare multiple sources to confirm their agreement.
Below is a list of countries included, and sources for recent monthly data. A complete country-by-country methodology for all countries, including those outside of Europe, is available for download here.
- Austria: ENTSO-E
- Belgium: ENTSO-E
- Bulgaria: ENTSO-E
- Croatia: ENTSO-E
- Cyprus: Eurostat
- Czechia: ENTSO-E
- Denmark: ENTSO-E
- Estonia: ENTSO-E
- Finland: Biomass, gas, hydro, solar and wind from Eurostat; other fuels from ENTSO-E
- France: ENTSO-E
- Germany: Biomass and gas from Agora; other fuels from ENTSO-E
- Greece: ENTSO-E
- Hungary: Solar data before 2020 from Eurostat; other fuels from ENTSO-E
- Ireland: Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland
- Italy: Biomass and solar from Terna; other fuels from ENTSO-E. Flow data from Terna
- Latvia: ENTSO-E
- Lithuania: ENTSO-E
- Luxembourg: Eurostat
- Malta: Eurostat
- Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands
- Poland: Solar data from ARE via Instrat; other fuels from ENTSO-E
- Portugal: ENTSO-E
- Romania: ENTSO-E
- Slovakia: ENTSO-E
- Slovenia: ENTSO-E
- Spain: ENTSO-E. Flow data from e-SIOS
- Sweden: ENTSO-E
Emissions
Note: this methodology differs slightly from our global methodology, in that it uses emissions factors more specific to EU countries. As a result, figures provided in this report will differ slightly from those we report elsewhere.
We report emissions values by fuel type, and emissions intensity by country. These values are calculated by multiplying our generation numbers by the below emissions factors:
- Hard coal 830gCO2eq/kWh
- Lignite 1100gCO2eq/kWh
- Fossil gas 370gCO2eq/kWh
- Other fossil fuels 700gCO2eq/kWh.
These factors are calculated with reference to data on the greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation from the European Environment Agency (EEA) and gross electricity production and electricity production by fuel type from Eurostat. These factors reproduce recent historic emissions at an EU level, but for a number of reasons will not be completely accurate at country level. In particular, thermal plant efficiency and the carbon content of fuels varies by country.
N.b. due to the methodology used by the EEA for the historic dataset, the values do not include CO2eq emissions from the combustion of biomass; nor do they include upstream emissions (e.g. fugitive emissions due to methane leaks).
Emissions intensity is calculated as total emissions divided by total generation.
Short Run Marginal Cost (SRMC) of generation
SRMC is calculated as the cost of fuel per MWh of generation, plus the cost of carbon credits (EU-ETS) per MWh. Variable operating and maintenance costs are not included.
The following plant efficiency rates have been applied:
- Gas plant efficiency rate = 55% (Lower Heating Value)
- Coal plant efficiency rate = 40%
Coal (API2), gas (TTF) and CO2 (EU-ETS) prices are provided by Montel.
Solar and gas savings
All solar capacity data is in gigawatts (DC)
1 Net Calorific Value = 0.9 Gross Calorific Value
Calorific value of Russian gas = 37.83 MJ/m3
1 billion cubic metre = 10.5 Terawatt hours
Acknowledgements
Sarah Brown, Paweł Czyżak, Hannah Broadbent, Chelsea Bruce-Lockhart, Reynaldo Dizon, Matt Ewen, Nicolas Fulghum, Libby Copsey, Alison Candlin, Chris Rosslowe and Harriet Fox.
Media Coverage
- Bloomberg
- Reuters
- World Economic Forum
- Forbes
- Süddeutsche Zeitung
- Die Welt
- El Mundo
- La Repubblica
- Anadolu Agency
- Infobae
- Austria Press Agency
- Euractiv
- Energy Monitor
- Les Echos
- Montel
- Straits Times
- Carbon Brief
- Social Europe
- S&P Global
- Politico
- EU Observer
- Sky News
- New York Times
- Le Monde
- South China Morning Post
- Australian Financial Review
- Yahoo News
- Next Gazeta
- Kompas
- The Guardian