
Breadcrumbs
G20 Per Capita Coal Power Emissions 2023
Australia and South Korea retain their positions as G20's top polluters.
About
This analysis looks into the coal emissions of the G20 on a per capita basis, using data from Ember’s Global Electricity Review 2023, generation data from Electricity Data Explorer and annual population data from the United Nations.
Executive summary
Australia, South Korea are G20's top coal polluters per capita
More countries are seeing decreasing per capita coal emissions as they shift towards clean power, but coal pollution remains an issue.
Aditya Lolla Asia Programme Lead, Ember
India, as the host of the G20 summit, has the opportunity to assume climate leadership in the G20 and hold the bloc accountable. India's plans to ramp up renewable energy seem to align well with the COP28 president's call for tripling renewables by 2030. India's early backing to this call can not only influence the G20 into action but also ensure that the developed countries bring their per capita emissions down.

Introduction: Why G20 matters
G20 holds the key in keeping 1.5C within reach
The G20 could make or break global efforts to accelerate clean power.
The G20 has become a focal point for global efforts to advance clean power transition and reduce carbon emissions. Accounting for 85% of the global GDP and contributing to 80% of the world’s power sector emissions, the G20 plays a crucial role to lead this transition.
Around 36% of global electricity was generated from coal in 2022, producing 8,367 million tonnes of carbon emissions. Calculated on a per capita basis, this means that the average person worldwide emitted around 1.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide from coal power in 2022.
In addition to comparing countries on their share of coal power and total power sector emissions, it is a helpful metric to consider emissions on a per capita basis to compensate for large differences in population size and electricity demand.
Ember data shows that G20 countries (excluding the EU as a region) emit 1.6 tonnes of coal power emissions per capita, exceeding the world average of 1.1 tonnes of carbon dioxide.
Yet the G20 countries remain divided in their deliberations on the call to triple renewables and have failed to come to a consensus.
Amid controversies, 75 nations are showing commitment by either phasing out coal or not building new coal plants without carbon capture. However, challenges remain, as seven G20 nations—Brazil, China, India, Japan, South Korea, South Africa, and the United States—haven’t yet unveiled their coal phase-down strategies.
Highlighted by an increasingly extreme climate, the urgency to ensure a global temperature rise well below 1.5C is clearer than ever. As the world’s major economies and top carbon emitters, decisions the G20 states make on clean transition will have lasting implications. And wider acceleration of renewables within the G20 will help drive this.
Ranked: G20 per capita emissions
Emissions per capita in Australia and South Korea still far ahead
Each of the top two polluters emit more than triple the 2022 global average, highlighting the urgency for faster clean transition.
Australia remained the highest in terms of per capita coal power emissions of all G20 countries despite recent uptick in wind and solar power. Australia has twice the electricity use per capita of China, and still 47% of its electricity in 2022 was from coal power. However, solar and wind power have been growing: their share of electricity rose from 7% in 2015 to almost 26% in 2022, which was the main reason for the fall in share of coal from 64% to 48%. At the same time, electricity use per capita was broadly unchanged. This means per capita coal power emissions fell by 26% from 2015 to 2022.
In 2022, coal power emissions per capita fell by about 5%, compared to 2021, as coal generation fell by 8 TWh. This was caused by a rise in solar, wind and gas generation, even as electricity demand rose by more than 2%.
In South Korea, the share of wind and solar was only 1% of electricity in 2015, and it has grown fivefold since then to more than 5% in 2022. Yet South Korea’s solar and wind share is still well below the global average of 12%, and their electricity is still 34% powered by coal. This has led them to emit more than three metric tonnes of carbon dioxide per individual, which also amounts to approximately three times the global average. This is despite their per capita coal emissions having dropped by 10% in seven years between 2015 to 2022.
Trends and implications
The slow progress of transition
The combined G20 per capita emissions barely changed since 2015.
Although per capita emissions have declined in most G20 countries since 2015, this is not enough to reduce global coal power emissions per capita, nor the overall G20 coal power emissions per capita. In fact, the G20 per capita coal emissions slightly increased by about 9% from 1.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2015 to 1.6 tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2022.
Coal power is still rising, where it needs to be rapidly falling. Concerted efforts are required to accelerate the transition to renewables and effectively phase down coal power. Adopting renewables on a broader scale will play a pivotal role in expediting the clean power transition, which is essential to significantly reduce per capita coal power emissions.
Conclusion
G20’s crucial role in tripling renewables by 2030
Opportunity for G20 to take centre stage on an ambitious global renewables goal, leading to an accelerated transition to clean power.
Investing in renewables, rather than persisting with coal dependency, brings multiple benefits. Renewables provide homegrown clean power, curb emissions, bolster energy security and spur economic growth through innovation and job creation.
Supporting Material
Methodology
Emissions per capita calculations
Viewing emissions that are averaged over population size in each country helps to assess the degree of coal pollution individuals are responsible for. For this report, we calculate coal power emissions using the IPCC AR5 midpoint lifecycle emissions factor of 820gCO2eqkWh-1, multiplying it by electricity generation. In real terms this figure is known to be an underestimate, but allows comparability between countries and does not significantly impact the rankings in this report.
Per capita values were calculated using annual population data from the United Nations. Total coal emissions generated in a country or region were divided by the population data for a given year. The analysis excludes G20 countries without coal generation (i.e. Saudi Arabia).
Data set
The data set includes the calculated per capita coal emissions of all G20 countries included in this analysis, as well as the world average numbers. You can access the data set here. For the raw data of coal generation, please refer to our Electricity Data Explorer, or download the data.
Acknowledgements
Dave Jones and Aditya Lolla played a critical role in developing the analytical elements of this report. Uni Lee, Nicolas Fulghum and Matt Ewen all played key roles in data validation and methodological accuracy. The contributions of Hannah Broadbent in editing and structure enhancement, along with Chelsea Bruce-Lockhart‘s expertise in data visualisations, have been invaluable in shaping the final outcome of this work.
Header imageQueensland’s largest single coal-fired power station in Gladstone, Queensland, Australia
Credit: Lincoln Fowler / Alamy Stock Photo
Media Coverage
- Reuters
- South China Morning Post
- The Guardian
- Eco-Business
- Kompas
- Katadata
- Antara
- The Straits Times
- Radio Free Asia
- The Economic Times
- The Times of India
- CNBC Africa
- Naver
- Dunya News
- Busan.com
- Naeil.com
- Business News
- Digital Journal
- France24
- RFI
- Hankook Ilbo
- Báo Tin Tức
- Radio Taiwan International
- Deutschlandfunk